Ankur Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Ankur?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Ankur would be a striking name choice.
Position 1521, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1981 with 40 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Ankur in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Ankur, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1975-1981, whereas clearly downward trends happened around 1996-1999.
The popularity trend for Ankur has been spiralling downward for a while. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Ankur has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Ankur?
Ankur's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Ankur is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Relative to what it once was, Ankur has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Ankur (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | 5 | 12,284 | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | 6 | 10,886 | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | 8 | 9,034 | |
2008 | 9 | 8,354 | |
2007 | 5 | 12,476 | |
2006 | 9 | 8,038 | |
2005 | 6 | 10,207 | |
2004 | 5 | 11,458 | |
2003 | 10 | 6,751 | |
2002 | 9 | 7,075 | |
2001 | 8 | 7,557 | |
2000 | 8 | 7,468 | |
1999 | 13 | 5,051 | |
1998 | 20 | 3,599 | |
1997 | 17 | 3,890 | |
1996 | 23 | 3,112 | |
1995 | 17 | 3,704 | |
1994 | 26 | 2,768 | |
1993 | 14 | 4,241 | |
1992 | 16 | 3,754 | |
1991 | 23 | 2,831 | |
1990 | 24 | 2,701 | |
1989 | 24 | 2,620 | |
1988 | 29 | 2,145 | |
1987 | 23 | 2,403 | |
1986 | 29 | 2,008 | |
1985 | 27 | 2,073 | |
1984 | 26 | 2,036 | |
1983 | 22 | 2,273 | |
1982 | 35 | 1,678 | |
1981 | 40 | 1,521 | |
1980 | 33 | 1,730 | |
1979 | 30 | 1,833 | |
1978 | 18 | 2,479 | |
1977 | 18 | 2,462 | |
1976 | 16 | 2,608 | |
1975 | 9 | 3,673 | |
1974 | 7 | 4,208 | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |