Aqib Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Aqib?
In 2018 the rare name Aqib, ranked the 7,602nd Most Popular Boys Name in the United States.Uncommon, Aqib would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #6,353 in 1998.
But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 2014 with 11 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Aqib was less than 5, most recently in 2017.
Aqib's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Aqib for their newborn has risen.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Aqib?
Aqib's popularity is at a very high point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Aqib is mostly unused but has recently started to rise upward in popularity.
for Percentages.| Aqib (Boy) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | 10 | 7,602 |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | 10 | 7,614 |
| 2015 | | 8 | 8,778 |
| 2014 | | 11 | 7,080 |
| 2013 | | 9 | 8,144 |
| 2012 | | 8 | 8,915 |
| 2011 | | 9 | 8,110 |
| 2010 | | 9 | 8,178 |
| 2009 | | 9 | 8,336 |
| 2008 | | 7 | 9,921 |
| 2007 | | 7 | 9,844 |
| 2006 | | 9 | 8,043 |
| 2005 | | 5 | 11,585 |
| 2004 | | 7 | 8,983 |
| 2003 | | 5 | 10,994 |
| 2002 | | 7 | 8,514 |
| 2001 | | 6 | 9,315 |
| 2000 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1999 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1998 | | 9 | 6,353 |
| 1997 | | 5 | 9,349 |
| 1996 | | 5 | 9,092 |
| 1995 | | 6 | 7,848 |
| 1994 | | 5 | 8,863 |
| 1993 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1992 | | 6 | 7,474 |
| 1991 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1990 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1989 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1988 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1987 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1986 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1985 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1984 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1983 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1982 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1981 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1980 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1979 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1978 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1977 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1976 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1975 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1974 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |