Ashwin Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Ashwin?
In 2018 the rare name Ashwin, ranked the 2,532nd Most Popular Boys Name in the United States.Uncommon, Ashwin would be a striking name choice.
Position 1441, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 2001 with 86 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Ashwin was less than 5, most recently in 1978.
Approximately during the years 1981-1985, 1988-1991, and 1995-1999, the name Ashwin took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 2016-2017.
The popularity trend for Ashwin has been moving downward for a while. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Ashwin for their newborn has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Ashwin?
Currently, the name is at a mid point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Ashwin is quite distinctive and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Ashwin (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 50 | 2,532 | |
2017 | 56 | 2,315 | |
2016 | 71 | 2,009 | |
2015 | 72 | 1,999 | |
2014 | 65 | 2,120 | |
2013 | 70 | 1,964 | |
2012 | 57 | 2,268 | |
2011 | 61 | 2,146 | |
2010 | 79 | 1,833 | |
2009 | 54 | 2,382 | |
2008 | 83 | 1,790 | |
2007 | 59 | 2,238 | |
2006 | 81 | 1,724 | |
2005 | 67 | 1,892 | |
2004 | 80 | 1,617 | |
2003 | 79 | 1,593 | |
2002 | 81 | 1,529 | |
2001 | 86 | 1,441 | |
2000 | 72 | 1,627 | |
1999 | 75 | 1,501 | |
1998 | 65 | 1,603 | |
1997 | 43 | 2,063 | |
1996 | 43 | 2,019 | |
1995 | 31 | 2,447 | |
1994 | 37 | 2,181 | |
1993 | 28 | 2,582 | |
1992 | 32 | 2,309 | |
1991 | 38 | 1,982 | |
1990 | 25 | 2,628 | |
1989 | 23 | 2,696 | |
1988 | 16 | 3,210 | |
1987 | 31 | 1,975 | |
1986 | 17 | 2,900 | |
1985 | 26 | 2,119 | |
1984 | 21 | 2,368 | |
1983 | 11 | 3,638 | |
1982 | 11 | 3,701 | |
1981 | 7 | 4,988 | |
1980 | 14 | 3,106 | |
1979 | 9 | 4,093 | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | 7 | 4,622 | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |