Dede Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Dede?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Dede would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1023 was reached in 1961 with 113 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Dede was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Dede, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1944-1950, and 1953-1961, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1961-1965, and 1971-1976.
For a number of years, the name Dede has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Dede for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Dede?
Dede's popularity is at an extremely low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Dede is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Relative to what it once was, Dede has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Dede (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | 5 | 17,821 | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | 6 | 14,604 | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | 5 | 16,079 | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | 5 | 15,655 | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | 5 | 13,495 | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | 6 | 10,153 | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | 5 | 11,060 | |
1984 | 5 | 10,794 | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | 12 | 5,624 | |
1981 | 14 | 5,030 | |
1980 | 8 | 7,572 | |
1979 | 17 | 4,269 | |
1978 | 16 | 4,306 | |
1977 | 22 | 3,401 | |
1976 | 18 | 3,706 | |
1975 | 21 | 3,298 | |
1974 | 34 | 2,307 | |
1973 | 36 | 2,183 | |
1972 | 32 | 2,321 | |
1971 | 49 | 1,809 | |
1970 | 40 | 2,051 | |
1969 | 52 | 1,672 | |
1968 | 41 | 1,862 | |
1967 | 43 | 1,762 | |
1966 | 41 | 1,771 | |
1965 | 40 | 1,805 | |
1964 | 70 | 1,345 | |
1963 | 71 | 1,308 | |
1962 | 83 | 1,214 | |
1961 | 113 | 1,023 | |
1960 | 81 | 1,214 | |
1959 | 75 | 1,236 | |
1958 | 65 | 1,313 | |
1957 | 52 | 1,474 | |
1956 | 53 | 1,459 | |
1955 | 45 | 1,521 | |
1954 | 41 | 1,590 | |
1953 | 34 | 1,713 | |
1952 | 37 | 1,586 | |
1951 | 23 | 2,073 | |
1950 | 31 | 1,689 | |
1949 | 24 | 1,972 | |
1948 | 24 | 1,964 | |
1947 | 23 | 2,052 | |
1946 | 13 | 2,768 | |
1945 | 12 | 2,630 | |
1944 | 9 | 3,183 | |
1943 | 10 | 3,085 | |
1942 | 6 | 4,229 | |
1941 | 10 | 2,876 | |
1940 | 10 | 2,782 | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | 5 | 4,465 | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | 5 | 4,423 | |
1933 | 5 | 4,356 | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |