Deepak Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Deepak?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Deepak would be a striking name choice.
Position 2071, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1980 with 26 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Deepak was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Deepak, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1971-1975.
The popularity trend for Deepak has steadily decreased for a while. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Deepak lately has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Deepak?
Deepak's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Deepak is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Deepak (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | 10 | 7,653 | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | 8 | 8,939 | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | 7 | 10,101 | |
2008 | 9 | 8,460 | |
2007 | 7 | 10,012 | |
2006 | 8 | 8,897 | |
2005 | 16 | 5,083 | |
2004 | 12 | 6,220 | |
2003 | 10 | 6,841 | |
2002 | 14 | 5,195 | |
2001 | 8 | 7,699 | |
2000 | 14 | 5,092 | |
1999 | 18 | 4,023 | |
1998 | 11 | 5,558 | |
1997 | 8 | 6,760 | |
1996 | 16 | 4,054 | |
1995 | 18 | 3,585 | |
1994 | 13 | 4,591 | |
1993 | 17 | 3,694 | |
1992 | 10 | 5,317 | |
1991 | 16 | 3,683 | |
1990 | 11 | 4,747 | |
1989 | 12 | 4,334 | |
1988 | 17 | 3,102 | |
1987 | 12 | 3,780 | |
1986 | 12 | 3,691 | |
1985 | 18 | 2,738 | |
1984 | 10 | 3,991 | |
1983 | 13 | 3,276 | |
1982 | 13 | 3,328 | |
1981 | 16 | 2,800 | |
1980 | 26 | 2,071 | |
1979 | 18 | 2,603 | |
1978 | 11 | 3,448 | |
1977 | 12 | 3,240 | |
1976 | 12 | 3,134 | |
1975 | 18 | 2,388 | |
1974 | 10 | 3,378 | |
1973 | 11 | 3,060 | |
1972 | 13 | 2,696 | |
1971 | 7 | 4,067 | |
1970 | 12 | 2,767 | |
1969 | 8 | 3,377 | |
1968 | 7 | 3,437 | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | 5 | 4,029 | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |