What's New
Fact of the Week
Dooley Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Dooley?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Dooley would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #11,927 in 2005 with 5 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Dooley in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Dooley's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Dooley has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Dooley?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very high point.
The name Dooley is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Dooley (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | 5 | 11,927 | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |