Drinda Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Drinda?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Drinda would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #1,818 in 1944 with 22 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Drinda was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Drinda's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Drinda for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Drinda?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very low point.
The name Drinda is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Drinda (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | 5 | 8,678 | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | 5 | 7,778 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | 5 | 6,786 | |
1964 | 8 | 5,133 | |
1963 | 7 | 5,469 | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | 9 | 4,634 | |
1960 | 6 | 5,884 | |
1959 | 8 | 4,741 | |
1958 | 5 | 6,347 | |
1957 | 9 | 4,311 | |
1956 | 10 | 3,981 | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | 7 | 4,601 | |
1951 | 8 | 4,127 | |
1950 | 8 | 4,047 | |
1949 | 7 | 4,345 | |
1948 | 9 | 3,669 | |
1947 | 17 | 2,476 | |
1946 | 12 | 2,919 | |
1945 | 20 | 1,894 | |
1944 | 22 | 1,818 | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |