Forbes Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Forbes?
Ranking 9,952nd in popularity in the United States for boys in 2018, the name Forbes is rare.Forbes, would be a stand out, distinctive name selection.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #2,302 in 1945.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 1918 with 12 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Forbes was less than 5, most recently in 2017.
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a mid point.
How popular will Forbes be?
Forbes's popularity has been moving upward for some time. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Forbes for their newborn has risen.
The name Forbes is mostly unused but will probably continue to rise upward in popularity.
Forbes (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 7 | 9,952 | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | 5 | 12,658 | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | 7 | 9,898 | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | 5 | 9,748 | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | 6 | 7,470 | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | 5 | 5,228 | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | 6 | 3,696 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | 5 | 3,927 | |
1951 | 7 | 3,167 | |
1950 | 5 | 3,868 | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | 10 | 2,302 | |
1944 | 8 | 2,709 | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | 6 | 3,243 | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | 7 | 2,981 | |
1935 | 5 | 3,849 | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | 9 | 2,709 | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | 5 | 4,191 | |
1928 | 6 | 3,867 | |
1927 | 5 | 4,413 | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | 5 | 4,460 | |
1924 | 10 | 2,887 | |
1923 | 7 | 3,595 | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | 8 | 3,313 | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | 6 | 3,887 | |
1918 | 12 | 2,445 | |
1917 | 6 | 3,704 | |
1916 | 10 | 2,611 | |
1915 | 11 | 2,361 | |
1914 | 6 | 3,038 | |
1913 | 5 | 2,989 | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |