Polo Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Polo?
In 2018 the rare name Polo, ranked the 13,524th Most Popular Boys Name in the United States.Uncommon, Polo would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #2,612 in 1928.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 2001 with 21 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Polo in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1987.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Polo occurred roughly during the years 1993-1996, 1997-2001, and 2008-2011.
Polo's popularity has been spiralling downward for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Polo has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Polo?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a low point.
The name Polo is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Polo (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 5 | 13,524 | |
2017 | 6 | 11,825 | |
2016 | 11 | 7,463 | |
2015 | 8 | 9,346 | |
2014 | 6 | 11,755 | |
2013 | 10 | 7,947 | |
2012 | 17 | 5,431 | |
2011 | 18 | 5,137 | |
2010 | 14 | 6,287 | |
2009 | 12 | 7,120 | |
2008 | 8 | 9,630 | |
2007 | 9 | 8,730 | |
2006 | 14 | 6,015 | |
2005 | 6 | 11,116 | |
2004 | 9 | 8,010 | |
2003 | 10 | 7,102 | |
2002 | 14 | 5,321 | |
2001 | 21 | 3,944 | |
2000 | 13 | 5,503 | |
1999 | 13 | 5,250 | |
1998 | 16 | 4,363 | |
1997 | 14 | 4,619 | |
1996 | 16 | 4,135 | |
1995 | 12 | 5,037 | |
1994 | 12 | 5,039 | |
1993 | 9 | 6,100 | |
1992 | 12 | 4,790 | |
1991 | 9 | 5,818 | |
1990 | 8 | 6,259 | |
1989 | 13 | 4,220 | |
1988 | 8 | 5,594 | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | 10 | 4,386 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | 6 | 6,035 | |
1982 | 5 | 7,097 | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | 5 | 4,299 | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | 6 | 3,833 | |
1957 | 6 | 3,877 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | 5 | 4,258 | |
1954 | 8 | 3,116 | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | 5 | 4,071 | |
1949 | 6 | 3,618 | |
1948 | 8 | 2,953 | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | 5 | 3,795 | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | 6 | 3,446 | |
1937 | 6 | 3,440 | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | 5 | 4,034 | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | 5 | 4,200 | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | 11 | 2,612 | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | 7 | 3,656 | |
1924 | 6 | 4,238 | |
1923 | 6 | 4,146 | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | 7 | 3,793 | |
1920 | 7 | 3,746 | |
1919 | 6 | 4,059 | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | 6 | 3,880 | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |