Rekha Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Rekha?
In 2018 less than 5 children were given the name in the United States.Rekha, would be a stand out, distinctive name selection.
Position 4369, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1979 with 17 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Rekha was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Rekha's popularity is at a low point when measured against its most notable year.
How popular will Rekha be?
The popularity trend for Rekha has remained mostly unchanged for a while. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Rekha for their newborn has dropped.
The name Rekha is mostly unused and has recently started to drift downward in popularity.
for Percentages.| Rekha (Girl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | 6 | 16,097 |
| 2012 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | 8 | 13,644 |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | 5 | 18,538 |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2002 | | 11 | 9,352 |
| 2001 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2000 | | 6 | 14,609 |
| 1999 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1998 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1997 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1996 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1995 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1994 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1993 | | 6 | 13,044 |
| 1992 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1991 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1990 | | 11 | 7,731 |
| 1989 | | 10 | 7,888 |
| 1988 | | 5 | 13,351 |
| 1987 | | 7 | 9,546 |
| 1986 | | 7 | 9,307 |
| 1985 | | 10 | 6,817 |
| 1984 | | 8 | 7,961 |
| 1983 | | 9 | 7,121 |
| 1982 | | 10 | 6,733 |
| 1981 | | 9 | 7,232 |
| 1980 | | 10 | 6,648 |
| 1979 | | 17 | 4,369 |
| 1978 | | 6 | 9,422 |
| 1977 | | 5 | 10,827 |
| 1976 | | 9 | 6,453 |
| 1975 | | 8 | 6,970 |
| 1974 | | 6 | 8,446 |
| 1973 | | 6 | 8,148 |
| 1972 | | 8 | 6,403 |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | 9 | 5,711 |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |