Shama Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Shama?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Shama would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #3997 was reached in 1974.
But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 1979 with 18 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Shama was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Shama has been moving downward in popularity. however, the number of children named Shama lately has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Shama?
Shama's popularity is at a low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Shama is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Shama (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | 7 | 14,101 | |
2015 | 5 | 18,680 | |
2014 | 10 | 10,806 | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | 5 | 19,097 | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | 7 | 14,709 | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | 13 | 9,397 | |
2007 | 7 | 15,215 | |
2006 | 5 | 19,554 | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | 8 | 12,559 | |
2003 | 8 | 12,218 | |
2002 | 13 | 8,205 | |
2001 | 9 | 10,869 | |
2000 | 6 | 14,703 | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | 6 | 13,814 | |
1997 | 7 | 11,870 | |
1996 | 11 | 8,025 | |
1995 | 6 | 13,086 | |
1994 | 10 | 8,677 | |
1993 | 14 | 6,557 | |
1992 | 5 | 15,132 | |
1991 | 12 | 7,327 | |
1990 | 16 | 5,782 | |
1989 | 11 | 7,367 | |
1988 | 13 | 6,197 | |
1987 | 11 | 6,700 | |
1986 | 13 | 5,695 | |
1985 | 13 | 5,601 | |
1984 | 8 | 7,997 | |
1983 | 17 | 4,437 | |
1982 | 15 | 4,900 | |
1981 | 14 | 5,189 | |
1980 | 10 | 6,676 | |
1979 | 18 | 4,190 | |
1978 | 8 | 7,506 | |
1977 | 17 | 4,199 | |
1976 | 10 | 5,953 | |
1975 | 10 | 5,892 | |
1974 | 16 | 3,997 | |
1973 | 5 | 9,497 | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | 7 | 7,215 | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | 5 | 7,955 | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |