Shameeka Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Shameeka?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Shameeka would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #1493 was reached in 1977.
But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 1980 with 77 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Shameeka was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Shameeka, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1972-1977, whereas 1982-1986, and 1991-1997 were years of successive downward movement.
For a number of years, the name Shameeka has been moving downward in popularity. however, the number of children named Shameeka lately has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Shameeka?
Shameeka's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Shameeka is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Relative to what it once was, Shameeka has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Shameeka (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | 5 | 17,507 | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | 7 | 12,194 | |
1997 | 10 | 8,910 | |
1996 | 13 | 7,064 | |
1995 | 11 | 7,983 | |
1994 | 19 | 5,207 | |
1993 | 29 | 3,757 | |
1992 | 26 | 4,064 | |
1991 | 26 | 4,028 | |
1990 | 28 | 3,794 | |
1989 | 31 | 3,384 | |
1988 | 43 | 2,525 | |
1987 | 35 | 2,837 | |
1986 | 31 | 3,040 | |
1985 | 41 | 2,431 | |
1984 | 53 | 1,954 | |
1983 | 50 | 2,043 | |
1982 | 66 | 1,715 | |
1981 | 62 | 1,803 | |
1980 | 77 | 1,540 | |
1979 | 41 | 2,336 | |
1978 | 48 | 2,011 | |
1977 | 74 | 1,493 | |
1976 | 43 | 2,052 | |
1975 | 32 | 2,498 | |
1974 | 17 | 3,832 | |
1973 | 19 | 3,448 | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |