Shoshannah Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Shoshannah?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Shoshannah would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #5,199 in 1980 with 14 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Shoshannah was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Shoshannah's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Shoshannah lately has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Shoshannah?
Shoshannah's popularity is at a low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Shoshannah is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
for Percentages.| Shoshann. (Girl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | 6 | 15,611 |
| 2016 | | 6 | 15,937 |
| 2015 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2012 | | 5 | 19,132 |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2004 | | 6 | 15,799 |
| 2003 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2002 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2001 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2000 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1999 | | 6 | 14,167 |
| 1998 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1997 | | 8 | 10,681 |
| 1996 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1995 | | 7 | 11,622 |
| 1994 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1993 | | 5 | 15,445 |
| 1992 | | 8 | 10,335 |
| 1991 | | 7 | 11,332 |
| 1990 | | 5 | 14,938 |
| 1989 | | 6 | 12,145 |
| 1988 | | 7 | 10,236 |
| 1987 | | 9 | 7,904 |
| 1986 | | 6 | 10,707 |
| 1985 | | 13 | 5,620 |
| 1984 | | 5 | 11,916 |
| 1983 | | 6 | 10,080 |
| 1982 | | 9 | 7,378 |
| 1981 | | 7 | 8,925 |
| 1980 | | 14 | 5,199 |
| 1979 | | 9 | 7,224 |
| 1978 | | 11 | 5,908 |
| 1977 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1976 | | 10 | 5,970 |
| 1975 | | 8 | 7,041 |
| 1974 | | 7 | 7,552 |
| 1973 | | 10 | 5,518 |
| 1972 | | 6 | 8,104 |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | 6 | 7,851 |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | 5 | 7,688 |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |