Names of the Week
*
*
Fact of the Week
 More

Vonnie Name Popularity

    

Charts | Table | About | By Year

How popular is Vonnie?

Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.

This once, top 1000 name, Vonnie is currently less popular.

Position 831, its highest popularity RANKING, was reached in 1935.

However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 1959 with 102 occurrences.

In any year, the least number of babies named Vonnie was less than 5, most recently in 2018.

Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Vonnie occurred roughly during the years 1906-1910, 1911-1914, 1929-1934, 1940-1943, and 1956-1959, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1962-1965, and 1967-1971.

Sometimes the name Vonnie has been more popular as a girls name and sometimes it has been more popular as a boys.

The popularity trend for Vonnie has remained mostly unchanged for a while. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Vonnie for their newborn has remained about the same.

What does the future hold for the popularity of Vonnie?

Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at an extremely low point.

The name Vonnie is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.

Relative to what it once was, Vonnie has fallen out of favor as a given name.

*Mouse over the charts or scroll down to the table for data details.

 
Mouse over or Click for Percentages.
   Vonnie (Girl)Vonnie (Boy)
Year %No. of Babies Given NamePopul. RankNo. of Babies Given NamePopul. Rank
2018 < 5 -- < 5 --
2017 5 18,228 < 5 --
2016 < 5 -- < 5 --
2015 < 5 -- < 5 --
2014 7 14,454 < 5 --
2013 < 5 -- < 5 --
2012 < 5 -- < 5 --
2011 < 5 -- < 5 --
2010 < 5 -- < 5 --
2009 < 5 -- < 5 --
2008 < 5 -- < 5 --
2007 < 5 -- < 5 --
2006 < 5 -- < 5 --
2005 < 5 -- < 5 --
2004 7 14,102 < 5 --
2003 < 5 -- < 5 --
2002 < 5 -- < 5 --
2001 < 5 -- < 5 --
2000 < 5 -- < 5 --
1999 < 5 -- < 5 --
1998 < 5 -- < 5 --
1997 < 5 -- < 5 --
1996 < 5 -- < 5 --
1995 5 15,692 < 5 --
1994 6 13,379 < 5 --
1993 < 5 -- < 5 --
1992 6 13,282 < 5 --
1991 8 10,242 < 5 --
1990 < 5 -- < 5 --
1989 < 5 -- 5 9,172
1988 < 5 -- < 5 --
1987 < 5 -- < 5 --
1986 < 5 -- < 5 --
1985 8 8,298 < 5 --
1984 6 10,377 < 5 --
1983 10 6,691 < 5 --
1982 7 9,207 < 5 --
1981 12 5,881 < 5 --
1980 14 5,238 5 7,259
1979 9 7,302 < 5 --
1978 9 6,931 < 5 --
1977 7 8,420 < 5 --
1976 16 4,147 < 5 --
1975 10 5,979 < 5 --
1974 7 7,665 < 5 --
1973 18 3,629 < 5 --
1972 28 2,593 < 5 --
1971 16 3,938 < 5 --
1970 25 2,854 < 5 --
1969 34 2,206 8 3,589
1968 35 2,052 < 5 --
1967 35 2,009 < 5 --
1966 38 1,880 5 4,514
1965 41 1,798 7 3,530
1964 52 1,591 < 5 --
1963 56 1,506 < 5 --
1962 83 1,220 8 3,294
1961 73 1,304 8 3,337
1960 86 1,180 < 5 --
1959 102 1,058 9 3,031
1958 86 1,151 8 3,260
1957 81 1,177 9 3,016
1956 73 1,229 6 3,922
1955 91 1,063 10 2,754
1954 83 1,085 10 2,733
1953 79 1,099 9 2,893
1952 64 1,194 < 5 --
1951 91 981 10 2,657
1950 91 944 10 2,574
1949 85 972 9 2,794
1948 88 928 8 3,000
1947 59 1,181 14 2,164
1946 74 978 < 5 --
1945 73 888 6 3,320
1944 52 1,089 14 1,983
1943 86 843 9 2,724
1942 64 986 8 2,929
1941 65 917 8 2,861
1940 53 988 8 2,855
1939 46 1,065 10 2,441
1938 72 839 12 2,180
1937 63 876 9 2,671
1936 66 838 8 2,844
1935 69 831 8 2,931
1934 65 854 14 2,013
1933 55 922 9 2,730
1932 44 1,081 < 5 --
1931 46 1,042 15 1,999
1930 41 1,180 17 1,885
1929 32 1,368 9 2,971
1928 41 1,209 11 2,645
1927 31 1,484 < 5 --
1926 30 1,513 6 4,172
1925 35 1,375 6 4,170
1924 41 1,257 8 3,494
1923 38 1,282 < 5 --
1922 35 1,364 7 3,851
1921 30 1,540 < 5 --
1920 40 1,231 7 3,801
1919 35 1,322 11 2,658
1918 34 1,330 < 5 --
1917 32 1,305 8 3,205
1916 28 1,406 10 2,727
1915 33 1,227 10 2,610
1914 41 930 8 2,641
1913 17 1,463 < 5 --
1912 18 1,294 5 2,891
1911 13 1,369 5 1,987
1910 22 940 < 5 --
1909 12 1,286 < 5 --
1908 15 1,082 < 5 --
1907 10 1,377 < 5 --
1906 9 1,412 < 5 --
1905 10 1,296 < 5 --
1904 10 1,249 < 5 --
1903 12 1,074 < 5 --
1902 12 1,072 < 5 --
1901 9 1,221 < 5 --
1900 10 1,317 < 5 --
1899 5 1,836 < 5 --
1898 8 1,374 < 5 --
1897 < 5 -- < 5 --
1896 < 5 -- < 5 --
1895 6 1,587 < 5 --
1894 < 5 -- < 5 --
1893 < 5 -- < 5 --
1892 6 1,443 < 5 --
1891 < 5 -- < 5 --
1890 10 938 < 5 --
1889 < 5 -- < 5 --
1888 7 1,132 < 5 --
1887 < 5 -- < 5 --
1886 < 5 -- < 5 --
1885 < 5 -- < 5 --
1884 < 5 -- < 5 --
1883 < 5 -- < 5 --
1882 < 5 -- < 5 --
1881 < 5 -- < 5 --
1880 < 5 -- < 5 --

United States name popularity data is provided by the Social Security Administration and is based on Social Security card applications.

Data for a given year is not made available until well into the next year.

Data reflects what was recorded and has not been edited for errors, so for example the gender associated with a name may be incorrect.

The more babies that are given a particular name, the higher the popularity ranking. If multiple names have the same usage, the tie is broken by assigning popularity rank in alphabetical order. Therefore in the case of names with fewer occurrences, names with the same number of occurrences may have vastly different rankings because they will be interranked alphabetically.

To safeguard privacy, the SSA does not include names with less than 5 occurrences.

Please note, we update the data each May when the SSA releases new figures. All data changes at that time, including previous years, which will change minutely based on new information.