What's New
Word of the Week
Daffney Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Daffney?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Daffney would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #4,190 in 1975 with 15 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Daffney in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Daffney's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Daffney has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Daffney?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Daffney is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Daffney (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | 5 | 18,256 | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | 6 | 13,909 | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | 9 | 7,835 | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | 6 | 9,563 | |
1984 | 6 | 9,383 | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | 6 | 9,482 | |
1981 | 10 | 6,425 | |
1980 | 8 | 7,551 | |
1979 | 9 | 6,804 | |
1978 | 5 | 10,079 | |
1977 | 8 | 7,004 | |
1976 | 11 | 5,287 | |
1975 | 15 | 4,190 | |
1974 | 14 | 4,272 | |
1973 | 9 | 5,664 | |
1972 | 11 | 4,848 | |
1971 | 8 | 6,116 | |
1970 | 8 | 5,923 | |
1969 | 9 | 5,117 | |
1968 | 9 | 4,846 | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | 6 | 6,135 | |
1963 | 10 | 4,311 | |
1962 | 9 | 4,591 | |
1961 | 5 | 6,743 | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |