Names of the Week
*
*
Fact of the Week
 More

Deanie Name Popularity

    

Charts | Table | About | By Year

How popular is Deanie?

Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.

Uncommon, Deanie would be a striking name choice.

Its highest popularity RANKING of #1599 was reached in 1939.

But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 1962 with 38 occurrences.

In any year, the least number of babies named Deanie was less than 5, most recently in 2018.

Deanie, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1936-1939, 1940-1943, and 1959-1962, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1965-1968.

Sometimes the name Deanie has been more popular as a girls name and sometimes it has been more popular as a boys.

For a number of years, the name Deanie has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Deanie for their newborn has remained about the same.

What does the future hold for the popularity of Deanie?

Deanie's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.

The name Deanie is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.

Relative to what it once was, Deanie has fallen out of favor as a given name.

*Mouse over the charts or scroll down to the table for data details.

 
Mouse over or Click for Percentages.
   Deanie (Girl)Deanie (Boy)
Year %No. of Babies Given NamePopul. RankNo. of Babies Given NamePopul. Rank
2018 < 5 -- < 5 --
2017 < 5 -- < 5 --
2016 < 5 -- < 5 --
2015 < 5 -- < 5 --
2014 < 5 -- < 5 --
2013 < 5 -- < 5 --
2012 < 5 -- < 5 --
2011 < 5 -- < 5 --
2010 < 5 -- < 5 --
2009 < 5 -- < 5 --
2008 < 5 -- < 5 --
2007 < 5 -- < 5 --
2006 < 5 -- < 5 --
2005 < 5 -- < 5 --
2004 < 5 -- < 5 --
2003 < 5 -- < 5 --
2002 < 5 -- < 5 --
2001 < 5 -- < 5 --
2000 < 5 -- < 5 --
1999 < 5 -- < 5 --
1998 < 5 -- < 5 --
1997 6 12,472 < 5 --
1996 < 5 -- < 5 --
1995 5 13,980 < 5 --
1994 < 5 -- < 5 --
1993 < 5 -- < 5 --
1992 < 5 -- < 5 --
1991 < 5 -- < 5 --
1990 < 5 -- < 5 --
1989 < 5 -- < 5 --
1988 < 5 -- < 5 --
1987 < 5 -- < 5 --
1986 5 11,355 < 5 --
1985 < 5 -- < 5 --
1984 < 5 -- < 5 --
1983 < 5 -- < 5 --
1982 7 8,432 < 5 --
1981 6 9,379 < 5 --
1980 < 5 -- < 5 --
1979 6 9,257 < 5 --
1978 < 5 -- < 5 --
1977 6 8,705 < 5 --
1976 5 9,623 < 5 --
1975 < 5 -- < 5 --
1974 5 9,083 < 5 --
1973 7 6,817 < 5 --
1972 7 6,708 < 5 --
1971 8 6,134 < 5 --
1970 7 6,488 < 5 --
1969 18 3,223 < 5 --
1968 12 4,046 < 5 --
1967 14 3,514 < 5 --
1966 16 3,176 < 5 --
1965 19 2,855 < 5 --
1964 16 3,270 < 5 --
1963 20 2,798 5 4,188
1962 38 1,862 < 5 --
1961 16 3,211 5 4,203
1960 14 3,386 < 5 --
1959 18 2,776 < 5 --
1958 17 2,881 < 5 --
1957 9 4,291 < 5 --
1956 13 3,377 < 5 --
1955 16 2,854 < 5 --
1954 15 2,911 < 5 --
1953 18 2,537 < 5 --
1952 14 2,947 < 5 --
1951 19 2,328 < 5 --
1950 8 4,035 < 5 --
1949 14 2,758 < 5 --
1948 12 3,004 < 5 --
1947 10 3,507 5 3,854
1946 11 3,070 < 5 --
1945 17 2,083 < 5 --
1944 14 2,427 < 5 --
1943 17 2,170 < 5 --
1942 14 2,448 5 3,680
1941 12 2,566 < 5 --
1940 6 3,962 < 5 --
1939 23 1,599 < 5 --
1938 12 2,471 < 5 --
1937 11 2,597 < 5 --
1936 9 2,914 < 5 --
1935 12 2,461 < 5 --
1934 10 2,782 < 5 --
1933 9 2,927 < 5 --
1932 7 3,649 < 5 --
1931 5 4,468 < 5 --
1930 9 3,116 < 5 --
1929 < 5 -- < 5 --
1928 6 4,299 < 5 --
1927 5 4,972 < 5 --
1926 10 3,090 < 5 --
1925 8 3,754 < 5 --
1924 6 4,580 < 5 --
1923 < 5 -- < 5 --
1922 6 4,574 < 5 --
1921 < 5 -- < 5 --
1920 5 5,152 < 5 --
1919 8 3,539 < 5 --
1918 < 5 -- < 5 --
1917 < 5 -- < 5 --
1916 5 4,581 < 5 --
1915 12 2,423 < 5 --
1914 8 2,696 < 5 --
1913 < 5 -- < 5 --
1912 < 5 -- < 5 --
1911 < 5 -- < 5 --
1910 < 5 -- < 5 --
1909 < 5 -- < 5 --
1908 < 5 -- < 5 --
1907 < 5 -- < 5 --
1906 < 5 -- < 5 --
1905 < 5 -- < 5 --
1904 6 1,699 < 5 --
1903 < 5 -- < 5 --
1902 < 5 -- < 5 --
1901 < 5 -- < 5 --
1900 < 5 -- < 5 --
1899 < 5 -- < 5 --
1898 < 5 -- < 5 --
1897 < 5 -- < 5 --
1896 < 5 -- < 5 --
1895 < 5 -- < 5 --
1894 < 5 -- < 5 --
1893 < 5 -- < 5 --
1892 < 5 -- < 5 --
1891 < 5 -- < 5 --
1890 < 5 -- < 5 --
1889 < 5 -- < 5 --
1888 < 5 -- < 5 --
1887 < 5 -- < 5 --
1886 < 5 -- < 5 --
1885 < 5 -- < 5 --
1884 < 5 -- < 5 --
1883 < 5 -- < 5 --
1882 < 5 -- < 5 --
1881 < 5 -- < 5 --
1880 < 5 -- < 5 --

United States name popularity data is provided by the Social Security Administration and is based on Social Security card applications.

Data for a given year is not made available until well into the next year.

Data reflects what was recorded and has not been edited for errors, so for example the gender associated with a name may be incorrect.

The more babies that are given a particular name, the higher the popularity ranking. If multiple names have the same usage, the tie is broken by assigning popularity rank in alphabetical order. Therefore in the case of names with fewer occurrences, names with the same number of occurrences may have vastly different rankings because they will be interranked alphabetically.

To safeguard privacy, the SSA does not include names with less than 5 occurrences.

Please note, we update the data each May when the SSA releases new figures. All data changes at that time, including previous years, which will change minutely based on new information.