Jumah Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jumah?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jumah would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #5419 was reached in 1978 with 6 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Jumah was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Jumah has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Jumah lately has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jumah?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a high point.
The name Jumah is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
for Percentages.| Jumah (Boy) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2012 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2002 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2001 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2000 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1999 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1998 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1997 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1996 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1995 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1994 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1993 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1992 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1991 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1990 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1989 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1988 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1987 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1986 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1985 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1984 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1983 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1982 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1981 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1980 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1979 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1978 | | 6 | 5,419 |
| 1977 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1976 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1975 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1974 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |