Ranjit Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Ranjit?
In 2018 less than 5 children were given the name in the United States.Ranjit, would be a stand out, distinctive name selection.
Position 3524, its highest popularity RANKING, was reached in 1969.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1980 with 10 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Ranjit was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Currently, the name is at a mid point when compared to its most popular year.
How popular will Ranjit be?
The popularity trend for Ranjit has remained mostly unchanged for a while. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Ranjit lately has remained about the same.
The name Ranjit is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
for Percentages.| Ranjit (Boy) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2012 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2002 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2001 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2000 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1999 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1998 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1997 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1996 | | 9 | 6,378 |
| 1995 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1994 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1993 | | 9 | 6,110 |
| 1992 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1991 | | 9 | 5,830 |
| 1990 | | 6 | 7,885 |
| 1989 | | 10 | 5,084 |
| 1988 | | 7 | 6,274 |
| 1987 | | 8 | 5,334 |
| 1986 | | 6 | 6,533 |
| 1985 | | 5 | 7,339 |
| 1984 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1983 | | 6 | 6,050 |
| 1982 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1981 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1980 | | 10 | 4,061 |
| 1979 | | 5 | 6,822 |
| 1978 | | 7 | 4,927 |
| 1977 | | 7 | 4,991 |
| 1976 | | 5 | 6,268 |
| 1975 | | 7 | 4,670 |
| 1974 | | 5 | 5,817 |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | 7 | 4,337 |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | 5 | 5,271 |
| 1969 | | 8 | 3,524 |
| 1968 | | 7 | 3,601 |
| 1967 | | 6 | 3,871 |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |